DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) vs OpenAI o3-mini
Deep comparison of open-weight 671B DeepSeek R1 Full vs OpenAI’s o3-mini: AIME math, hard algorithm coding, all-in cost per million tokens, and production selection tips — so you can get expert-level reasoning at outstanding value.
DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)
OpenAI o3-mini
For budget-sensitive builders who need the full derivation trail, DeepSeek R1 Full is the value king of reasoning. If you need precise latency control (low effort for fast output) or complex tool calling, o3-mini wins on engineering ecosystem fit.
Official benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) | OpenAI o3-mini | Winner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2024 (USAMO invitational math) | 79.8% | 83.7% (high) | OpenAI o3-mini | o3-mini slightly leads on high-effort math derivation |
| Codeforces (contest rating) | 2029 (96.3rd percentile) | 2073 | Tie | Both reach master-level contest algorithm performance |
| All-in cost per 1M tokens | $0.55 / $2.19 (wins) | $1.10 / $4.40 | DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) | DeepSeek R1 is 50%+ cheaper — ideal for high-volume reasoning |
DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) strengths & weaknesses
- Extreme value: output at $2.19/1M — about half of o3-mini
- Open weights and visible reasoning chain — transparent logic
- Top human-level results on AIME and Codeforces
- Official endpoints can hit 503 congestion at peak (CallAI capacity pools help)
- 64K context is smaller than some 128K/200K models
OpenAI o3-mini strengths & weaknesses
- reasoning_effort (low/medium/high) for tunable compute
- Native 128K context for longer documents
- Native Function Calling and Structured Outputs
- More than 2× the call price of DeepSeek R1
- Hidden internal thinking — full chain text is not exposed
Scenario recommendations
| Scenario | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Grad-school math, advanced calculus & algorithm drills | Prefer DeepSeek R1 Full | Full visible thinking like a human scratchpad, at very low cost. |
| Enterprise automation pipelines & function calling | Prefer o3-mini | Strict JSON Schema structured output and native Tool Calling. |
Python dual-model gateway sample
OpenAI-compatibleOne Base URL and API key — switch models with the model parameter only:
import os
from openai import OpenAI
# One CallAI key — route freely between DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) and OpenAI o3-mini
client = OpenAI(
api_key="sk-live-your-callai-key",
base_url="https://api.callaiapi.com/v1"
)
def query_model(model_id: str, prompt: str):
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model_id,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
stream=True
)
for chunk in response:
print(chunk.choices[0].delta.content or "", end="", flush=True)
print("\n" + "="*40 + "\n")
# Model 1: DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)
print(">>> Output from: DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)")
query_model("deepseek-r1", "Briefly analyze the trade-offs of this architecture")
# Model 2: OpenAI o3-mini
print(">>> Output from: OpenAI o3-mini")
query_model("o3-mini", "Briefly analyze the trade-offs of this architecture")FAQ
Is CallAI’s DeepSeek R1 the real full 671B model?
Yes — full undistilled MoE 671B official weights on dedicated capacity. Classic authenticity prompts verify it; it is not a 7B/32B distilled fake relay.
What parameters matter when calling these two models?
Do not pass temperature or top_p to o3-mini — use reasoning_effort. For DeepSeek R1, set client timeout to 120s+ because thinking chains can be long.