Head-to-head selection guide

DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) vs OpenAI o3-mini

Deep comparison of open-weight 671B DeepSeek R1 Full vs OpenAI’s o3-mini: AIME math, hard algorithm coding, all-in cost per million tokens, and production selection tips — so you can get expert-level reasoning at outstanding value.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)

deepseek-r1
Input / 1M:$0.55 / 1M
Output / 1M:$2.19 / 1M
Thinking / 1M:$2.19 / 1M
Cache read / 1M:$0.14 / 1M
Context window:64K
Typical TTFT:2.5s - 15s (thinking chain)
OpenAI

OpenAI o3-mini

o3-mini
Input / 1M:$1.1 / 1M
Output / 1M:$4.4 / 1M
Thinking / 1M:$4.4 / 1M
Cache read / 1M:$0.55 / 1M
Context window:128K
Typical TTFT:1.2s - 8s (thinking chain)
Verdict & selection advice

For budget-sensitive builders who need the full derivation trail, DeepSeek R1 Full is the value king of reasoning. If you need precise latency control (low effort for fast output) or complex tool calling, o3-mini wins on engineering ecosystem fit.

Official benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)OpenAI o3-miniWinnerNotes
AIME 2024 (USAMO invitational math)79.8%83.7% (high)OpenAI o3-minio3-mini slightly leads on high-effort math derivation
Codeforces (contest rating)2029 (96.3rd percentile)2073TieBoth reach master-level contest algorithm performance
All-in cost per 1M tokens$0.55 / $2.19 (wins)$1.10 / $4.40DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)DeepSeek R1 is 50%+ cheaper — ideal for high-volume reasoning

DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) strengths & weaknesses

Strengths:
  • Extreme value: output at $2.19/1M — about half of o3-mini
  • Open weights and visible reasoning chain — transparent logic
  • Top human-level results on AIME and Codeforces
Weaknesses:
  • Official endpoints can hit 503 congestion at peak (CallAI capacity pools help)
  • 64K context is smaller than some 128K/200K models

OpenAI o3-mini strengths & weaknesses

Strengths:
  • reasoning_effort (low/medium/high) for tunable compute
  • Native 128K context for longer documents
  • Native Function Calling and Structured Outputs
Weaknesses:
  • More than 2× the call price of DeepSeek R1
  • Hidden internal thinking — full chain text is not exposed

Scenario recommendations

ScenarioPickWhy
Grad-school math, advanced calculus & algorithm drillsPrefer DeepSeek R1 FullFull visible thinking like a human scratchpad, at very low cost.
Enterprise automation pipelines & function callingPrefer o3-miniStrict JSON Schema structured output and native Tool Calling.

Python dual-model gateway sample

OpenAI-compatible

One Base URL and API key — switch models with the model parameter only:

import os
from openai import OpenAI

# One CallAI key — route freely between DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B) and OpenAI o3-mini
client = OpenAI(
    api_key="sk-live-your-callai-key",
    base_url="https://api.callaiapi.com/v1"
)

def query_model(model_id: str, prompt: str):
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model_id,
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
        stream=True
    )
    for chunk in response:
        print(chunk.choices[0].delta.content or "", end="", flush=True)
    print("\n" + "="*40 + "\n")

# Model 1: DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)
print(">>> Output from: DeepSeek R1 (Full 671B)")
query_model("deepseek-r1", "Briefly analyze the trade-offs of this architecture")

# Model 2: OpenAI o3-mini
print(">>> Output from: OpenAI o3-mini")
query_model("o3-mini", "Briefly analyze the trade-offs of this architecture")

FAQ

Is CallAI’s DeepSeek R1 the real full 671B model?

Yes — full undistilled MoE 671B official weights on dedicated capacity. Classic authenticity prompts verify it; it is not a 7B/32B distilled fake relay.

What parameters matter when calling these two models?

Do not pass temperature or top_p to o3-mini — use reasoning_effort. For DeepSeek R1, set client timeout to 120s+ because thinking chains can be long.

Compare exact spend for your prompts on both models?
Paste text into the free token calculator for live USD estimates.
Open token calculator →